Winning elections in a pandemic

Alex Walker is Director at Mercury Public Affairs and is Leader of the Milton Keynes Conservatives Group. Follow on Twitter

The Covid-19 pandemic has had an intriguing impact on election results around the world. Some incumbents have stormed home, others have struggled, and some have lost to successful challengers. I have been lucky over the past year to have worked on a number of international campaigns and I have seen first hand how Covid has impacted the public mood in different countries and in very different ways depending on the approach of the candidates, political parties and their message. 

In March 2020, across the world, Covid-19 unsurprisingly stormed onto the list of issues that concerned voters. The fear was real, the lack of understanding of the virus was deeply unnerving and voters were worried about their health and the health of their family. Economic concerns quickly came into play and remain in the most part today, and then more recently the vaccine rollout has been a central priority for voters. 

For incumbents facing an election in such an environment, there is an endless balancing act between effective government communications and incredibly delicate campaigning. I saw this most profoundly working with the Mayor of Kyiv Vitaly Klitschko in the lead up to Ukraine’s municipal election in October 2020. Throughout the campaign, Covid was an extremely fluid issue and there was a consistent and, I’d argue, helpful tension between public health communications and campaigning. What became clear early was that while voters were forgiving of the decisions to implement restrictions, they wanted them to be articulated clearly. Moreover, they wanted to see the Mayor being busy and keeping vital services moving. We brought in daily live streamed daily briefings, we set up an economic recovery council of business leaders and ensured that the Mayor was regularly talking about protecting jobs and income. The Mayor ended up being re-elected with more than 50% of the vote. 

Back home in the local elections in May, the Conservative party benefited greatly from an impressive vaccine rollout. The party leaned into the vaccine bounce with daily updates on the number of jabs in arms and memorable social media graphics for key milestones. The media helped promote the importance of getting jabbed and thousands of people posted their little appointment cards online, essentially acting as micro influencers for the party’s central campaign message. In Milton Keynes, where I led a group of 16 Conservative councillors, we were seeing it on the doorstep, with one colleague being told by a resident: “You have 4 jabs and 2 votes from this household.” Thanks to that narrative and some good local issues, I now lead the largest group on MK Council with 24 brilliant Conservative councillors. And of course, there was success up and down the country. 

A good vaccination programme isn’t a silver bullet, as experienced by Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel’s March elections. Israel has been held up as the world leader for vaccinations, a rollout designed, implemented and well communicated by Netanyahu’s Government. However, working with Naftali Bennet and his new party Yamina, the data was showing many other issues in play: the economy, crime and, above all else, questions over the character of Netanyahu. My colleague George Birnbaum, who first helped Bibi get elected in ‘97 and has been involved in every national election since, identified early that voters were framing the election as pro-Bibi and anti-Bibi. Naftali Bennett, along with parties from the left and right, strengthened the anti-Bibi sentiment and were able to secure enough seats to eventually form a new and historic coalition government.  

I want to finally jump over to Romania and its general election in November 2020. A country dominated by the Socialist Democratic Party (PSD) since the fall of communism. A party that has been dogged with corruption, at times resulting in tragedy as seen in the 2015 Colectiv nightclub fire which saw 64 young people lose their life. A minority Liberal Government had taken over after PSD voted itself out of power in 2019. The Liberal Government had done an impressive job handling the Covid crisis, early to lockdown and build capacity into the health system. Just two months before the election they were riding high in the polls, an 8% advantage over PSD. Could it be that Covid was about to act as an accelerator and end the robust structural vote for the socialists? No. Despite a relatively good campaign from the Liberals and their strong record in government, PSD still returned the largest vote share and secured the largest number of MPs. Thankfully for the Liberals they were able to grab support from a new party USR PLUS and still formed a government. But, it did highlight Covid’s disruptive limits. 

We can be certain that Covid-19 and its impact on elections is not yet over. France’s 2022 Presidential election will be one to watch. The handling of the pandemic will define incumbents’ records whether they want it to or not. When they face their next election, they will need to decide whether they embrace it or try to define their campaign on other issues. As ever, there is no one size fits all strategy, as I have experienced over the last 18 months in which campaigns have aged me dramatically!  

If you have ideas for the group or would like to get involved, please email us.

This piece was written for our website.

Social housing must be part of building plans to help boost the economy

Aisha Vance-Cuthbert is Co-Director of Conservatives in Communications and Head of Communications at a large housing association

This morning, in Dudley, Prime Minister Boris Johnson will unveil his taskforce ‘Project Speed’ – chaired by Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak – aimed at accelerating building and infrastructure projects to get the UK economy moving again as we slowly emerge from lockdown.

This move is welcomed by the construction industry, and those who are both directly and indirectly employed by the sector. However, what we need – in addition to schools, infrastructure and market sale / rent homes – are new social homes for the millions of people who are currently in expensive, temporary and often poor-quality accommodation.

The Government has already signalled that it understands and wants to solve the housing and homelessness crisis, which go hand-in-hand. For example, only last week, the Government announced an extra £105 million in funding to help keep rough sleepers off the streets.

The trouble is, as noble as this sounds, most councils have depleted the cash because of the lack of available social housing. For the most part, the only available option is to place people in expensive nightly-paid accommodation, hotels or bed and breakfasts. And this is exactly why the Government must invest in high quality social homes – to help tackle rough sleeping, solve the housing crisis and save the taxpayer millions.

There’s also a ‘levelling up’ argument. After the general election, I wrote an article for The Times Red Box on why building more social housing would reward millions of voters along the Red Wall. The Conservatives ‘borrowed’ millions of votes from Labour, giving them a significant, working majority.

Specifically, I highlighted a YouGov poll of undecided voters carried out on behalf of the National Housing Federation. It found that 80% of ‘Labour Leavers’ worry about their housing costs. It also found that housing matters more to ‘Labour Leavers’ than crime. In fact, they signalled that housing is the fourth most important issue after Brexit, the NHS and immigration.

I welcome the Government’s ambition to re-boot the economy; creating local jobs and supporting our public services. But, I hope that it will also include building more affordable homes. Building homes – of all tenures – will help kick-start the economy while, at the same time, protecting our public finances.

If you have ideas for the group or would like to get involved, please email us.

This piece was written for our website.